Stablize shot on final cut pro 10.3.4 upgrade#
Stablize shot on final cut pro 10.3.4 tv#
Stablize shot on final cut pro 10.3.4 mac#

If you only need DIT-type work, you don't necessarily need a new MBP. If you absolutely need portability for on-site editing, then the MBP is the best way. It is quieter and a bit faster than the 2015 but sustained transcoding performance can't match the iMac. Touchbar is OK but I think most pro users already know the commands by memory. I'm not crazy about the new MBP design - I've got various dongles and docks, but the thinner lighter design is nice. The limited benchmarks I've seen for the 2017 show it a bit faster than the 2016, but a top-spec 2017 iMac will be considerably faster. if someone can convince me that the new best MBP will not disappoint, and will blow my current MBP out of the water, then I'll jump. If the iMac Pro turns out better for this workflow (somewhat questionable due to lack of Quick Sync), then I'll just sell the 2017 iMac. I ordered a top-spec 2017 iMac 27 which will be delivered next week. I am in a similar situation, except instead of MBP it's waiting for the iMac Pro.

Stablize shot on final cut pro 10.3.4 mac#

It is much faster than a 12-core Mac Pro for this workload - I tested that last week. IMO for an H264 4k project of this scale (which requires huge transcodes) you need the fastest available computer which is currently a top-spec 2017 iMac 27.

Stablize shot on final cut pro 10.3.4 tv#

The most important thing right now is speed to get through a whole season of TV with a looming deadline, so I'm considering just getting the iMac and dumping it once the project is done.If I LOVE it, I keep it after, and then use my current MBP on location just for DIT type work and then do major editing when I get back home. I'm looking for feedback on performance running 4k projects with the new Kaby Lake MBP's.I really need the portability of a MBP, but am considering getting one of the new iMacs to get me through a major project. There is some on the iMacs, but only the i7 models.ДЄny real world experience you can share with these units from those who have recently upgraded would be greatly appreciated. I can't seem to find any benchmarks or performance comparisons for the new MBP with the Kaby Lakes. I'm running a 24TB TB2 G-Speed Shuttle XL. I'm using an external 27' 4k Samsung monitor. I'm currently editing on a maxed out Late 2013 MBP:

Stablize shot on final cut pro 10.3.4 upgrade#

I would upgrade the base 8GB of RAM myself to 40GB total (+2x 16GB). At least it has 8GB VRAM in the Radeon 580. One other issue, is that, the wait is over a month from Apple (or anywhere else) to get a 27' with i7 processor in ANY configuration, so if I want one now, I'm stuck with a 27' i5 3.8GHz with a 2TB fusion drive. I would upgrade my MBP when Apple brings out a beefier MBP with at least 32GB RAM.Д«UT.if someone can convince me that the new best MBP will not disappoint, and will blow my current MBP out of the water, then I'll jump.

If I LOVE it, I keep it after, and then use my current MBP on location just for DIT type work and then do major editing when I get back home. If I lose say $500 three months from now when the project is done, I can live with that.

The most important thing right now is speed to get through a whole season of TV with a looming deadline, so I'm considering just getting the iMac and dumping it once the project is done. I really need the portability of a MBP, but am considering getting one of the new iMacs to get me through a major project. I've resisted upgrading because they STILL only come with a max potential of 16GB RAM, which is what I purchased almost 4 years ago. I'm looking for feedback on performance running 4k projects with the new Kaby Lake MBP's.

I know this is hardware related but it's FCPX specific and there's not much going on that forum.